Advanced Search

Student achievement comparisons--comprehensive induction vs prevailing induction

A federally-funded randomized controlled trial found that beginning teachers who received two years of comprehensive induction support produced greater student learning gains—the equivalent of a student moving from the 50th to the 58th percentile in math achievement and from the 50th to 54th percentile in reading—compared to colleagues served by prevailing induction programs.
Source: 
Glazerman, S., E. Isenberg, et. al. (June 2010). Impacts of Comprehensive Teacher Induction: Final Results From a Randomized Controlled Study (NCEE 2010–4027). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
Key Message(s): 
Comprehensive induction accelerates new teacher development toward effectiveness.
Induction is a critical piece of a comprehensive approach to ensuring teacher effectiveness.
Induction is worth the cost and provides a positive return on investment.
0
Your rating: None